That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. But if you want to play tall how can we make the most out of y. I remember one of my really long games I ended up basically becoming a fallen empire. There are many, many ways to play a militarist build. By building robots and getting % pop growth speed modifiers. Until now, playing “wide” and securing as much territory as possible was considered the only way to stay competitive with rival Empires. Relic world start is pretty good if you can get a few planets to fuel. If you're playing a standard planetary economy, you are either going to need to expand or get yourself some vassals. ago. Playing tall will give you a hefty chunk of feeling like a plotter, a devious schemer who carefully plans his eventual ascension to near godhood. Any void dwellers build with militarist. habitats as well as branch offices contribute to empire size. 2 and before) because a wide and a "tall" empires will grow at the same rate, to about the same cap, with only some minor buffs for "tall" like mastery of nature that don't even come into play until later. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. Technocracy is amazing for more research gains. I think it would be cool if there was a terraformable slider. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of. For tall, your best bet is a megacorp. It is relatively. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. Essentially, tall and wide shouldn’t be wildly different as far as pop count goes. Its the eternal question that decides how you’re going to play your game of stellaris and what you early strategy is going to be. After playing tall it feels really limiting to go back to wide which sucks because I get way more satisfaction from conquering large swathes of space than I do from basically playing as a fallen empire. Introduced with the title's Utopia expansion, habitats act as a tool that enables playing tall. I like tall play style but it currently requires more resource density and pop efficiency to work. I personally think thats fine, because I think that playing tall SHOULD be a challenge. Twenty systems is the breakpoint where number of systems owned raises your starbase cap, which is why it is sometimes given as a guide point. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. r/Stellaris. Go fanatic xenophile. So, there needs to be a growth penalty for Wide or a bonus for Tall. 1" patch out on the 14th shouldn't really change habitat. and the edicts and all the other bonuses from low empire size aren't enough as a semi wide empire would be. I play tall and use tributaries. Equilibrius Coastal Raider. Bribe them, then submit to vassalisation. Spoken like someone who isn’t even seven feet tall! Step 1: get boxed in by superior powers. If you rely on the bastion for defense for the latter half of the. A truly tall empire does not incur the sprawl in the first place. Stellaris Tall Build Guide. The tall playstyle dines like a gourmet only picking the very best and shunning the crud. The game actually requires a heavy amount of micromanagement, sectors or not. Also, I'm the Custodian. In Stellaris I can use my influence to grow wider by building starbases or settling colonies. WebShaman • 6 yr. If you make playing wide miserable thats bad too, because for many painting the map is. 11 votes, 19 comments. But to really take advantage of that small empire size, you need to focus on research and unity. 7. Tall empires are easier to defend from. Get heroic past (+1 trait) and meritocracy (+1 trait pick) Step 2. Give me the most broken empire you have. Step 2: pretend that you wanted to be small and ineffective in the first place. but a bunch of people would scream bloody murder about how they “nerfed” wide play styles so I doubt it will happen. As a long time Crusader Kings 2. The meta has shifted a lot throughout Stellaris’s life cycle and will likely shift a lot more in the future. Most people talk about Tall vs Wide like this: Wide involves getting a lot of territory, getting a lot of pops, and dominating the galaxy with overwhelming numbers; contrasted with playing Tall, which is about leaving a small galactic footprint but focusing your economy to keep up. Stellaris has no such restrictions, in fact it’s the opposite; there are almost no consequences for conquering other empires early, you even have choices depending on your situation, and early conquests allow you to conquer even more mid to late game. 3 base systems + 2 from finishing Expansion traditions + 2 from Efficient Bureaucracy civic + 5 from Imperial Prerogative ascension perk (and maybe another 2/4 if you can stomach playing pacifist plus whatever core sector technologies you can research) is more than enough to get you orbital habitats. I'm RPing a Determined Exterminator empire that doesn't want to grow…Honestly, walls like this I can live with, it's when the AI is blatantly pulling things out of it's ass it should have no way of obtaining that I start rage-quitting. Stellaris. The system is the backbone of Stellaris. Originally posted by twistedmelon: Tall is still a strategy, but it is more grey. and also having a planet to grow pops on (and then relocate them home) lets you grow a lot faster. Having every planet in a system with a habitat or colony. Every game I'm like "okay in gonna find the nearest choke points and play tall" and never actually do unless I get boxed in. 10x was very doable. ) Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. This is the God-Emperor Origin in Stellaris. self. I agree that this change makes habitat feeder worlds less desirable, I just don't think that's a nerf to what I'd consider "playing tall", or. Depeding on how many other empires there are, and where you are located, this can be a way to stay "tall" and dont have the feeling of that you are "wasting" systems out there. Pick Aptitude as your first tradition to get +1 trait. Pre-ftl civilizations could also arise. It doesn't stop people from trying to shoe-horn it into Stellaris, but it. They are more diplomatic than a typical empire, as you'll want at least a couple friends to establish commercial pacts with and build branch offices on their places. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. Stellaris has no such restrictions, in fact it’s the opposite; there are almost no consequences for conquering other empires early, you even have choices depending on your situation, and early conquests allow you to conquer even more mid to late game. Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. It is clear, that Stellaris tries it. This along with the +25% growth from devouring swarm AND +15% food bonus means some crazy fast breeding. My goal for an empire is to be a Megacorp with a fallen empire overlord, grow tall as I can, and make as much energy/research as possibleTall play in Stellaris is extremely difficult as it requires careful tuning of many parameters. The benefits of playing tall are as follows: Smaller empires are easier to manage. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. 7) ASpec 195K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. I have been thinking about something like this since playing a tall Void Dwellers game right after a very successful wide Overtuned game, but the work involved in sorting it all out was. Many people seem to have a misconception what "tall" means in Stellaris. R5: I just love having vassals and building a hegemony over conquest. Stellaris How To Start well in Grand Admiral New and Experienced Player Guide / Tutorial: The Starting Routine I use to get a good start in Grand Admiral gam. 4 planets that are high ascension level and low empire sprawl is tall, since in current Stellaris, each planet is basically the equivalent to an entire city in a game like Civilization. Honestly you should know better too. very strong. #1. It's a playstyle meant for defense and not offense. NB: this is system not planet. I think my problem is that i am too eager to expend. When i play these it often ends. 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. As I understand, the point is to focus on research and traditions and less so on economy, but I'm trying a tall run now and it feels like everything's sorta slow since my research speed is at 10, 7. General. Pick the difficulty level that matches the challenge you want to face. That depends on what you mean by playing tall. . Given that EUIV’s features aren’t currently available in Stellaris, the. I cant play stellaris this weekend to try and min max this build, so monday I can give you a stronger suggestion. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. "Tall" in Stellaris isn't doing more with less, it's just having less. 724Unfortunately there is no current way to play the way you want. Versus AI its possible to play tall but its harder than wide. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather. You need to go wide to get more resources and fund a larger army. Small. Reply. Stellaris "Tall" mainly means getting as much resources as possible out of a small(er) space. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. Start playing on easy mode in an empire that you don't like to play, then set up a goal like geting the worm to terraform your planets and then try to play as robotic ascencion, something stupid or boringly difficult. It gets in my way of actually being able to play. Making this a great strategy for beginners to try out. the best origins for making the game harder are: Doomsday. Report. 3 and my solutions for it. Instead it means to have the same amount of planets but concentrated in a smaller patch of space. Actually there IS a perfect answer. I would say going tall is even more viable now. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…. 7. I'm a poor guy, can't afford the DLC. The big idea with playing tall will. I don't understand how playing tall in this game works. Sorry mate but it kinda sounds more like you are just being a sore loser here. Wide means you have more variety of planets and has its own fun to it. That's not surprising, since the whole goal of the game is to expand as much and as quickly as possible, but it also means you're basically free to do whatever you want!. Stellaris has generally only encouraged "wide" play (largely because wide empires always have more pop growth, which leads to more of everything else). Unless a lower setting is fine for the Tall. Playing tall is a long-term strategy, so players should generally start using it. 7. The ultimate wide starting origin which is void dwellers gets called tall showing how much the community have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. Top 1% Rank by size. Low empire size penalties mean that; your empire will be researching and unlocking traditions faster than your neighbors. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. If you're spamming habitats, you aren't playing tall. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. I never played a Tall game before and usually rarely peaceful lol But sounds like a lot fun. Before 2. e. Build a world cracker or pacifier, declare war, and proceed to destroy all their habitable planets to wipe out the other empires and win a conquest victory. Stellaris players aren't at all happy with the AI habitat spam that plagues their games and have rallied yet again, begging Paradox to address the grand strategy game's long-running issue. Branch offices provide you a large income supplement, particularly credits, allowing you to focus your own economy. Related. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. the best ways to play tall are either: a trade empire (megacorp would be the best) because the best planet types (ecumenopolis/ring world) are the best for generating trade and trade does fully cover energy, consumer goods and unity production. However since few systems with a lot of planets/habitats pretty much are the same mechanically I do not consider it playong tall. I can't give you much perspective specific to your year as I can't be bothered to micromanage like that. After spending 82 let’s play episodes on insane difficulty (watch it here: ) testing the viability of a tall. Could you. Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. Since colony ships wasn't researched at the start, I. 3. . 3 is a bad idea. The challenge can come in the form of story play elements or taking an origin that is plain bad. walter. Ladies and gentlemen Tall has returned! In this video I will be showing off my latest Stellaris Meta Build; Tall Agrarian Ocean Paradise. Usually, when I'm playing tall I only have 6-8 worlds and go maybe 25%-50% over my admin cap, but 90 total is only enough admin cap to have maybe 4 worlds and some systems without significantly going over. Shipsets were reptilian. . 3 update is attempting to make playing "tall" more of a thing by changing some systems, like empire sprawl, so that a well developed tall empire is closer in power to a wide empire. Tall v wide is a bit of a false construct in stellaris specifically (always has been). When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. The biggest reason Wide is better than Tall is growth related. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris • by Nimitz-View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I don't want to own any vassals. Build Starbase at choke points, not on all outposts. Generally it's not really practical to play tall without the Void Dwellers origin as you would need insane luck to have a good. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. This may be changing in 3. With the changes made in 3. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. having the biggest, most. Clone army with the Ascendant path since you get 100 pops with +40% ruler output and +20% specialist output. And as a devouring swarm/hivemind, your habitability. Wide. To me, playing tall means investing resources in things that increase the efficiency of your pops, which allows you to produce roughly the. For Stellaris I tend to prefer the term "Dense" as in few systems, but densely populated with habitats. I've always preferred playing tall in 4x games and was wondering if there is any effective strategy for playing tall in this game. A tech tree geared to this Play style would be. For example, a well-placed machine uprising could kill the galactic emperor and end the imperium, or a rebellion could end up vassalizing its parent state, and forming its own bloc. 6 did: it removed the single functionality that provided a mechanical incentive. The tall vs wide playstyle has devolved from: tall (low systems low planets) vs wide (many systems many planets) to a new style of tall (low systems many planets/Habs) vs wide as it was before. I really love stellaris and want to try something new, but run out of ideas, also Stellaris has great communityTall vs wide use to be about science before 2. In a sense, they behave like planets you can construct yourself,. I'd like to see Stellaris travel down this route with a focus on corruption and general population unrest the farther out a colony is settled to the point where your fringe worlds need a constantly police or military presence to keep subdued unless you. He is punching well above his weight, and would be a strong player in multiplayer. -1. While habitats are good, it’s probably better to be funding colony ships. Nothing you do by restricting planets/ habitats offers you anything which you do not get when going wide. In Stellaris the game naturally flows for you to be playing Wide and the only way to play tall is by stacking habitats and/or ringworlds in your territory to make up for the lack of actual habitable planets you may find yourself with. Best. General. Empire sprawl is still used by the community, and the terms are interchangeable. It's basically how you use your influence. Been playing stellaris for a little bit now let’s say a couple of months and I was wondering if playing tall is worth it I’ve heard mixed opinions on the topic but if it is worth it could you all give me some tips!Well there is a method of playing 'tall'. Midgame though if you want to play tall, definitely transition into habitats in the systems you wish to develop. In terms of strong tall builds that actually perform well, there are basically only two: Habitat Spam, and the Nihilistic Acquisition Raider. I’m just worried how long it’ll hold an attack back later (I’ve already fought a war to a draw by throwing them back 4. So in Stellaris this would probably be a habitat/megastructure heavy playstyle and trying to do things that give you extra districts on your planets. Though 25x crises was a serious challenge. Expansion: After Discovery comes a period of rapid expansion. mining guilds is a lot better as the. Darvin3 • 2 yr. You can make the argument that 2. ago. Tall empires. for civics, mechanist is pretty good, syncretic evolution is great too, technocracy is ideal. Its more a general approach to stay small and go for quality or quantity. It's not about having few planets - in fact you should still get as many ( properly developed!! Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Good picks: Rapid/Slow Breeders and Nomadic/Sedentary: Getting more pops quicker. ago. On the plus side, we get more unity faster without explicitly focusing it. HappySack Mar 25 @ 3:07am. You could do a subterranean origin with lithoid using reanimator civic…. Playing tall or playing wide, which is better!? Most players start by building and advancing their empires in stellaris with a typical : expand, then build o. Currently, playing tall is neither fun nor competitive if you ask me. 2) Optimize Production Methods edict An edict with a base cost of 300 influence and a base duration of 10 years that increases resources from jobs by 50%. Introduction Stellaris - How To Play Tall (2. I believe this is OPS's most valuable asset. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. In Stellaris, it would be really nice if there was a way to convert to tall play after the game starts, because sometimes your start location just doesn't prevent peaceful expansion. If you play at lower difficulties, then the game is designed to be a chill roleplaying experience. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. This guide is incredible. All in all though I think this build I'm playing is more static than I like. 1 rules, the best way to play Tall was to reduce the number of systems you controlled. The problems with Stellaris, tall empires, 3. The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. The only way I can define Tall in Stellaris is when you focus heavily on science from day one to make your POP more efficient. Those would be some of the most basic types of non-linear mechanic which could make Tall play start to exist. #12. Megacorps are a solid empire-type. Another thing is the deep space stuff, and the auto-resettle building. I actually don't particularly dislike this change, but this was how I got. Victoria 2 was released 12 years ago, and victoria 3 is set to be released this year. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. Here is what I have to report back: -This mod is very impressive and proves a greater challenge than Glavius mod by far. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. 8. Playing as a corporation is a good way to play tall because 1) the managing is up to the AI so you just upgrade when their population reaches a certain point and 2) it opens you up to the galaxy through business, rather than just through diplomacy. ago. If you spreadsheeted the numbers for the old sprawl system, the best empire size for optimal tech output was around 20 planets, which is much larger than most people would consider to be tall, and even then such an empire's tech advantage only started to be. 8 tall isn't as viable anymore, can anyone give me a fleshed out strategy/perspective?If you're playing wide that sprawl is very low. 5. It doesn't mean it must be. It ends up being. playing tall or wide doesnt matter if you play in singleplayer BUT playing tall in. 0 wide was getting as many planets as possible while taking the large tech negatives from having those planets. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but people who play tall are "wrong". Going into the fir. Noanamus Mar 6, 2017 @ 4:21am. Darvin3 • 1 yr. The game has been around since 2016 and they. Wide and Tall isn’t a stellaris definition, it’s used in many strategy games. This mechanic takes your Colonies, Systems, Districts, Pops, and any Branch Offices you have and will give you penalties once you reach a certain point. 2. like clone army origin - can make some viable tall builds, but ultimately playing tall is intentionally handicapping yourself at this point (including in the 3. They would be also wrong. It doesn't matter how enlightened your culture or how advanced your technology is because imperium's bloated army can burry yoy under sheer size of it's manpower and resources with guns outdated by ten thousand years. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. That efficiency allows your small area to develop fast and do lots with your space, with growth exceeding cap. Get those techs and traditions which will make your pops more efficient. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. Traits wise, probably grab the usual Deviant Unruly Intelligent Natural Engineer combination. 2; 1; Reactions: Reply. I won by playing a Megacorp. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. This is a synergy-guide, not a min-max guide, for playing Necrophage origin. And in a game about choice the choice to play Tall or Wide should actually matter. Highly stable, unified group thats close proximity keeps together. I could just settle and terraform more planets to make more stations, but that is a long term and expensive process. What actually constitutes tall in this game? In my current game I'm playing fanatic egalitarian materialists who aspire to turn themselves in to a…I used the robotic mammalian portrait (the tall bulky machine with a glass front). Agreeing with PsySom here. Cons: Lots of micro, allows for a degree of dabbling in tall play for otherwise wide empires. Toggle signature “The middle of the road is all of the usable surface. Also if you turn off early game scaling it’s much more difficult. There is also the older mechanics such as increased tech cost per planet and ethics divergence by distance which will favour building tall. You have games like EU IV, Imperator, and CK2 where playing "Wide" comes with growing problems. . ago. ago. CryptoDeveloping Planets - Play Tall! This mod allows you to develop planets. It's okay to limit yourself to a smaller, more defensible slice of space, at least initially. And it can help a lot of your species has traits like intelligent or strong to take advantage of the bonuses, every plus 5% can help your empire survive longer. If you don't have to fight anyone for that space, it's free space, take it. 20 comments. If you stick to 10 systems and spam a bunch of habitats you are playing tall. So really you will want to find some sort of mod that provides benefits to those with few planets. With that in mind I think it's a step in the right direction for that kind of. How to play tall (yes again) Alright so I've been doing a little research and i know there is a bunch of threads about this already but hear me out. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. A scenario or playstyle that couldn't be improved by more expansion is not possible. Any other build will be strictly superior playing wide, and tall is just a. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. Flag was a pyramid symbol with yellow and black (split down the middle) yellow as the primary I think. The benefits of playing tall are as follows: Smaller empires are easier to manage. So for Tall vs Wide in Stellaris, your start location matters a lot more than your empire build. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. It was not fun. Ideally you would want to begin a period of rapid expansion towards the end of filling out this tree. . The guaranteed strategic resources is helpful if you end up not having any in your corner of space (plus it gives higher chances of researching those techs for extraction). In Stellaris tall games are a lot of fun where you limit yourself to around 20 systems and play as a galactic defender and mediator protecting the less advanced empires. 5K Online. There are many other strategy games where this is a very applicable concept, as there are penalties and downsides to growing bigger that can make your empire less. Playing tall is a strategy among others, it's not really a playstyle as it can be in some other games (well, mostly Civ5 in fact, and it's really just another word for turtling). The only playstyle I do not enjoy is playing with vassals, because I do not fully understand how to make that work and the little bits I do understand just make it seem rather bland. It can however be pretty challenging on to get right. What are some key things to do in Stellaris to build tall effectively? I want to play tall because I have been a wide, rapid expansionist in playstyle in basically every 4x/grand strategy game I've played. As quill is trying to get 200 years of peace achievement. Welcome to the patricians way to play Stellaris. ago. I always run into economic defects, Overpopulation and being serounded by larger empire's. Unlike Civ, we don't really have a hard dichotomy that swings one way or the other. Two strategies stand out when we talk about empire size. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. That fixed a lot of problems. If you aren't trying to min-max, you'll be happy, and if your empire is big enough, it wont matter anyway However you decide to play, have fun!Stellaris Galactic Paragons DLC has given us the Crusader civic and the Under One Rule Origin. We will use these. Play Tall Trait for Stellaris. If I'm playing tall, I'm aiming to keep my empire size below 100. Techno Necro. Thread starter Vampiresoap; Start date Apr 25, 2017; Jump to latest Follow Reply Menu We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. How can I play tall, and how good are my chances of being to defend against a large chunk of the galaxy? I have a 10k star fortress with 12 platforms and my entire fleet parked in the hyper lane entrance to my systems. Playing tall is naturally going to be somewhat more difficult in most cases, as you are essentially intentionally cutting your growth short. Tall builds are barely viable with DLCs, without them they're basically impossible. Third is that people will want a Bulwark, but probabably as a 1-planet minor vassal, in order to get significant starbase discounts (20%) that will also apply to planetary rings. Unyielding lets you support more Starbases, which means more room for Hydroponics buildings, which means more food without needing to devote pops to producing it. You'll have tall/wide elements in all empires depending on how you play, whether you're role-playing or not, whether you're playing single or multi and also your ethos and civics. Worth noting that the "drag" on research from empire size is pretty much the most negatively impactful (mechanically-speaking) aspect of a galaxy-spanning empire (i. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. There is the playing tall strategy. With wide you need a ton of governors, and must be replace them constantly. TLDR, I think tall isnt dead, it is just more gradient. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of. Option A is to build up your internal economy, with any commercial or trade agreements being bonuses to your own production. Planets and habitats within the same system counts as one system (but all there pops go towards pops penalty) The 0,01 penalty is the 1% penalty to research for each pop over 10 you have in your kingdom. all right. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and about 16 systems at present. Yeah, it would be nice if the game supported playing tall. Stellaris has an abstraction for Tall vs Wide in-game: the Empire Size mechanic. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment More posts you may likeMade it a research world to soak up all the Necrophage pops, and transferred some to buff up other worlds. Now that every system increases tech costs by a flat rate playing tall is merely minmaxxing system ownership.